– A Pseudo-Ottoman Blog: Occasional Musings –

Archive for the ‘China’ Category

Stealing Fish: The Chinese Gambit

On the collaborative website China Daily Mail, which aims to present a collection of interesting stories about China, while also constituting an opportunity for writers to promote their own sites, the following interesting story, culled from Foreign Policy, was presented the other day: the Chinese are “stealing” fish on a massive scale . . .

‘According to a recent study published in the journal Fish and Fisheries, the Chinese have been drastically underreporting the number of fish that Chinese ships catch in other countries’ waters every year. While China tells the UNFAO, the U.N. agency that tracks global fishing data, that Chinese distant-water fishing vessels take in roughly 368,000 tons of fish a year, the Fish and Fisheries report estimates that the real weight of the collective catch is more than 12 times that number – around 4.6 million tons a year. At the same time, China exaggerates its domestic catch. The report claims that the majority of the haul (64 percent) comes from off the coast of West Africa, where Chinese fishing practices could have a serious impact on the local population. “The study shows the extent of the looting of Africa, where so many people depend on seafood for basic protein,” Daniel Pauly, a professor at the University of British Columbia and one of the authors of the study, told the Guardian. “We need to know how many fish have been taken from the ocean to figure out what we can catch in the future. Countries need to realize the importance of accurately recording and reporting their catches and step up to the plate, or there will be no fish left for our children.” It’s important to note that just because the fishing goes unreported doesn’t mean it’s illegal. The Chinese government may have negotiated special (and usually secret) agreements with certain African coastal states allowing Chinese vessels to fish in the waters. It’s also true that the Chinese are not alone in exploiting West Africa’s abundant fishing grounds. But, if these estimates are correct, Chinese fishermen are doing it on a larger scale than anyone else, catching as much as 22 West African coastal countries and the other 38 countries fishing in the region combined. The long-term consequences for food security could be quite severe’.[1]


[1] “Is China secretly hoarding the world’s fish?” China Daily Mail (06 April 2013). http://chinadailymail.com/2013/04/06/is-china-secretly-hoarding-the-worlds-fish/.

What about Bob??? A Story about Outsourcing

The ever-inquisitive Russian state-sponsored broadcaster RT reported a story about Bob the other day: a ‘programmer at a US company outsourced his job to a Chinese contractor for a fraction of his six-figure salary. After handing over his login information, he spent his days on Facebook and perused cat videos while the Chinese firm worked in his name’.

Andrew Valentine of Verizon has come out to say that “Evidence even suggested [that codename Bob] had the same scam going across multiple companies in the area . . . he earned several hundred thousand dollars a year, and only had to pay the Chinese consulting firm about $50,000 annually”.[1]  Is Bob an all-American hero, getting paid for doing nothing much at all while having some Chinese workers slave away???  Is he simply a slacker who struck gold by means of doing on a small-scale what giant corporations have been doing for many, many years on gigantic scale??? Or is Bob the personification of Neo-Colonialist Capitalism, oftentimes referred to as Globalisation???


[1] “US programmer outsourced own job to China, spent workdays on Reddit and Facebook” RT (17 January 2013). http://rt.com/usa/news/us-employee-outsourcing-china-177/.

Bain Capital, Sensata and Mitt Romney

‘Joanne Penniston, Sensata worker who was arrested yesterday joins Thom Hartmann. As a single mother of two Joanne Penniston & the other workers at Sensata Technologies in Freeport, Illinois don’t want to lose their jobs – just before the holidays – and they’re willing to get arrested to show it. Is there any way to save these jobs before Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital ships them off overseas? (26 Oct 2012)’.

Tayyip’s Mosque: The Legacy Project

Writing a few days ago, Hugh Eakin posits that “late May of this year, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan—Turkey’s powerful prime minister, a devout Muslim, and the self-styled leader of the new Middle East—announced that he would be erecting his own grand mosque above the Bosphorus. It will be more prominent than Suleiman’s [mosque in the old part of the city of Istanbul]. The chosen site—the Büyük Çamlıca Tepesi, or Big Çamlıca Hill, overlooking the city’s Asian shore—is 268 meters above sea level; it is easily the most conspicuous point of land in greater metropolitan Istanbul”.[1]

Building this big mosque would carry a lot of weight in Turkey. On a street-level, murmurs that Tayyip and his AKP government are moving Turkey down the slippery slope towards an Iranian state of affairs are always broodingly present and eerily upsetting to the average Turk, unencumbered by a strict observance of the Prophet’s rules and regulations and attached to the freedoms ushered in by Atatürk and his quasi-secularist establishment. In reality, Shia Iran appears far removed from the AKP’s pseudo-Ottoman designs for Turkey. Turkey’s secularist credentials have always been far from certain, in spite of erstwhile headscarf controversies and other distractions. The state’s firm hold on the nation’s religious institutions and on the population’s levels of piety has never been questioned or opposed.[2]  Still, an outside observer like Eakin can easily state that “[t]his is not the first time that Turkey’s deeply secular state has seemed to move in a more religious direction. As far back as 1967, a close replica of another sixteenth-century Sinan mosque was built in Ankara; a more daring, modernist design by Vedat Dalokay was rejected. Turgut Özal, who was prime minister in the late 1980s and is credited with beginning the economic opening to the world that has matured under Erdoğan, was a devout Muslim who went on the Hajj while in office. And Erdoğan’s own AKP party is a direct heir to the since-banned Islamist party of Necmettin Erbakan,[3] who briefly served as Turkey’s first Islamist prime minister in the 1990s (leading to a military coup in 1997). But what makes the recent changes particularly dramatic is that the Turks themselves seem to be generally embracing them: headgear has become a point of pride for many Anatolian businesswomen, and the recent alcohol bans appear to have been imposed as much by local communities—by some far more than others—as by higher authorities. Indeed, Erdoğan, now in his third term of office, has a huge base of popular support. And while the AKP has not quite gained the supermajority in parliament the prime minister has sought, it has had sufficient dominance to transform significant parts of the Turkish political system”.[4]

In his search for suitable spots to erect visible markers of his tenure at the head of Turkey’s state ship, Tayyip Erdogan has conjured up more architectural projects in Istanbul: under ‘the name [of] “Canal Istanbul“, [for example, ] Turkey’s prime minister [has also] announced his [self-styled] crazy project [in Turkish, “Çılgın Proje”]. He plans to build a canal on the European side of Istanbul which will link the Black Sea with Marmara sea and will allow large tankers to pass. Canal Istanbul will be around 30 miles long, 25 metres deep and 150 metres wide. Erdogan said “Istanbul will become a city with two peninsulas and an island”. This will of course be a big change for Istanbul. Also the real estate market around the area will rise. Erdogan didn’t mention the exact coordinations of the canal but name Catalca was mentioned during the conversation. Main aim of the Istanbul Canal project will be to relieve congestion through the Bosphorus Strait and reduce chances of an environmental disaster as tankers carrying oil and gas from Russia and Central Asia pass through the waterway separating the Asian and European halves of Istanbul. The project is planned to be completed in 2023 when the 100th anniversary of Turkish Republic will be celebrated. They also plan to build a third airport for Istanbul which will have capacity for 60 million passengers annually’.[5]  At the time, which was April 2011, the BBC reported that ‘Turkey will build a new waterway to bypass the heavily congested Bosphorus Strait, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has announced. He said the 150m-wide (492ft) “Canal Istanbul” would link the Black Sea to the Sea of Marmara that opens to the Aegean Sea via the Dardanelles. Mr Erdogan said the canal would be about 45km-long (31 miles), describing it as “the greatest project of the century”. He did not disclose the exact location’.[6]  But Tayyip’s Kanalistanbul promises may have been nothing but pre-election rhetorical fluff, and his search for a legacy marker now seems to have found its true focus in the Çamlıca Mosque Project.

Last July, an architect involved in the project, Hacı Mehmet Güner stated in the Turkish daily Milliyet that “We will build an even larger dome than our ancestors made”, adding that the proposed house of worship will be erected in the “classical style”, will possess six minarets (like the famed Sultan Ahmed Camii, the popular Blue Mosque), minarets that will be taller than those of the Prophet’s Mosque in Medina, whose tallest minarets are 344 feet.[7]  In other words, Tayyip’s mosque will look like an Ottoman structure, while at the same time referring to the current centre of ‘Sunni Islam’, Saudi Arabia. Even though the Saudis actually regard all Muslims as apostates and unbelievers, only accepting their own brand of Wahhabi Islam as true to Allah’s precepts, their pious largesse is visible all across the Islamic, and the rest of the, world. On the website belonging to Turkey’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), one can read that ‘Turkish and Saudi foreign policy perspectives mutually support each other and create synergy. Mutual high level visits between two countries and the “High Level Strategic Dialogue Mechanism” which was established between Turkey and the GCC [Gulf Cooperation Council] in 2008 have become the driving forces for our activities towards the region. After the global economic crisis in 2009, Turkey-Saudi Arabia bilateral trade volume has been in recovery tendency. Trade volume between two countries reached 4.66 billion USD in 2010. The number of Turkish companies, mainly in contracting sector, which undertake huge projects in Saudi Arabia is increasing continuously. Similarly, there is a growing interest in Saudi business circles to Turkey. Saudi tourists visiting Turkey significantly increase every year since 2005. The recorded number of 84.000 Saudi tourists in 2010 is expected to rise considerably in 2011’.[8]

On 12 August 2010, the Global Islamic Finance Magazine reported that the ‘President [of the Islamic Development Bank (IDB)]‘s visit to Turkey [at that time] . . . enhances scopes for the expansion of trade among the member countries of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. During his visit, the IDB President Ahmad Mohamed Ali met with top Turkish officials in Ankara; first with President Abdullah Gül, then with the State Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Ali Babacan, State Minister Cevdet Yılmaz, Treasury Undersecretary İbrahim Çanakçı and TİKA President Musa Kulaklıkaya’.[9]  This last visit appeared to have been extremely important. TİKA or the Türk İşbirliği ve Koordınasyon Ajansı is a Turkish government agency set up in the aftermath of the dissolution of the Soviet Union to assist and encourage the development of the newly independent Turkic states in Central Asia. Since 1999 the agency has been linked to the office of the Prime Minister and since 2002 has been assisting in achieving Turkey’s newly articulated foreign policy goals,[10] which I termed pseudo-Ottoman some time ago.[11]  Getting back to the just-quoted GIFM piece: ‘During  the IDB President’s talks with TİKA President Musa Kulaklıkaya’, the IDB President Ali expressed his satisfaction with the mutual co-operation between the two administrations. He further outlined that the relations gained momentum with the Memorandum of Understanding signed between TIKA and the IDB in 2008, TIKA President Musa Kulaklikaya further stated that the development of existing co-operation would bring benefits to both sides’. [12]  Saudi Arabia’s busy agenda in the field of global proselytizing is well-known, and now, it would transpire, it even coincides with Turkey’s willingness to solidify its soft-power prestige across the world. Writing in the self-professed rightwing online publication Canada Free Press, Joseph Klein declared last year that the “Saudi government uses billions of dollars in oil revenues to promote Wahhabism in America and across the globe. David D. Aufhauser, a former Treasury Department general counsel, told a Senate committee in June 2004 that estimates of Saudi government spending went “north of $75 billion.”  The money financed thousands of mosques, schools and Islamic centers, the employment of thousands of propagandists and the printing of millions of religious teaching tracts”.[13]  And, as reproduced by an anti-jihadist blog, ‘[a]ccording to a major investigation by Washington Post reporter David B. Ottaway published on August 19, 2004, the Saudi government’s Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Endowment, Call and Guidance pays the salaries of 3,884 Wahhabi missionaries and preachers, who are six times as numerous as the 650 diplomats in Saudi Arabia’s 77 embassies’.[14]  Turkey, for its part, is not shy of promoting Islam and mosque-building either. As reported by the Xinhua news agency: the head ‘of Turkey’s Presidency of Religious Affairs Mehmet Görmez visited China in 2011 and signed a memorandum of understanding with China’s State Administration for Religious Affairs. The two countries agreed to boost bilateral cooperation in religion affairs such as Islamic education, Quran printing and student exchange programs’, in addition to constructing mosques for Chinese Muslims, or Chinese-speaking practitioners of Islam known as Hui.[15]  And underlining this resolve to foster ties between an AKP-led Turkey and the People’s Republic of China, keen on pacifying its Chinese-speaking Muslims (or Hui), between 31 August and 7 September 2012, a “2012 China-Turkey Islamic Cultural Expo and Performances” was held at the Ali Emiri Culture Centre[16] in the Istanbul district of Fatih.[17]

Turkey and Saudi Arabia, cooperating to spread the Prophet’s word across the world. And , according to the above-quoted GIFM piece, the ‘ties between Islamic financial insitutions in Turkey [and Saudi Arabia are strengthened] and [these ties] can further help to diversify the growing sector of Islamic banking and finance which is set to soar to over $1.5 trillion US dollars by 2012’.[18]


[1] Hugh Eakin, “Turkey’s Towering Ambition” The New York Review of Books (17 September 2012). http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2012/sep/17/turkey-towering-ambition/.

[2] “The Turkish Army: Guardian of Turkish Secularism???” A Pseudo-Ottoman Blog (09 August 2011). http://sitanbul.wordpress.com/2011/08/09/the-turkish-army-guardian-of-turkish-secularism/.

[3] “Turkey Loses its Islamist Figurehead: Erbakan has Died???” A Pseudo-Ottoman Blog (28 February 2011). http://sitanbul.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/turkey-loses-its-islamist-figurehead-erbakan-has-died/.

[4] Hugh Eakin, “Turkey’s Towering Ambition”.

[5] “Prime Minister Erdogan’s crazy project” Istanbul View (no date). http://www.istanbulview.com/erdogans-crazy-project/.

[6] “Turkey to build waterway to bypass Bosphorus Straits” BBC News (April 2011). http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13207304.

[7] Hugh Eakin, “Turkey’s Towering Ambition”.

[8] “Turkey-Saudi Arabia Relations” Ministry of Foreign Affairs. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkey-saudi-arabia-relations.en.mfa.

[9] “The President of the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) based in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia has made an official visit with delegates to discuss Islam” Global Islamic Finance Magazine (12 August 2010). http://islamic-finance.ru/blog/2010-08-12-102.

[10] “TİKA Tarihçesi” T.C. Başbakanlık TİKA. http://www.tika.gov.tr/tika-hakkinda/tarihce/1.

[11] Cfr. C. Erimtan, “A pseudo-Ottoman policy: Turkey’s new station in the world” Today’s Zaman (04 November 2010). http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?load=detay&link=226284.

[12] “The President of the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) based in Jeddah”.

[13] Joseph A. Klein, “Libya and Counter-Terrorism At The United Nations” Canada Free Press (21 September 2011). http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/40549.

[14] “Saudi Arabia’s Funding of American Mosques” Defeat the Third Jihad (15 September 2012). http://dttj.blogspot.com/2010/08/saudi-arabias-funding-of-american.html.

[15] “China to launch Islamic cultural pageant in Turkey (2)” Xinhua (30 August 2012). http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/102774/7929173.html.

[17] “China to launch Islamic cultural pageant in Turkey” Xinhua (30 August 2012). http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90782/7929166.html.

[18] “The President of the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) based in Jeddah”.

The New Cold War: The CIA Prepares Battleground Syria???

Turkey and the U.S. have been supporting the Syrian opposition since April 2011, and the U.S. Air Force Base at İncirlik plays a pivotal role in that scheme. That is the claim made by the notorious whistle-blower Sibel Edmonds. And now, the news agency United Press International cavalierly announces that the ‘CIA officers’ have joined ‘[a]llies in southern Turkey helping Syrian opposition fighters’.[1]

In fact, the report refers to a New York Times article. Eric Schmitt’s piece, appropriately entitled “C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition”, purports to spill the beans on the U.S. support for Syrian opponents of President Assad. He writes that a “small number of C.I.A. officers are operating secretly in southern Turkey, helping allies decide which Syrian opposition fighters across the border will receive arms to fight the Syrian government, according to American officials and Arab intelligence officers”.[2]  Is this another one of those strategically leaked Obama administration secrets supposed to bolster the Democrat’s standing among his gun-toting electorate???

Now that their activities have been touted in the New York Times, the C.I.A. operatives in Turkeyare probably no longer “operating secretly”. Schmitt even adds detail to his scoop: these “C.I.A. officers have been in southern Turkeyfor several weeks, in part to help keep weapons out of the hands of fighters allied with Al Qaeda or other terrorist groups, one senior American official said. The Obama administration has said it is not providing arms to the rebels, but it has also acknowledged that Syria’s neighbors would do so”.[3]  Even though the article does not set out to prove thatAmerica and Turkey have been secretly fueling the unrest in Syria, the above-quoted admissions nevertheless show that a lot of footwork has been done behind the scenes of Syria’s ‘uprising’. The administration’s disclosure that “neighbors” are arming Syria’s opposition reads like an admission of Turkish, Saudi, Qatari, and Libyan involvement in concocting the violent brew that isSyria’s internal armed struggle. Of course, the concept of neighbourhood has to be taken in a very broad sense.

The UPI report prophetically adds that the “struggle inside Syria has the potential to intensify in coming months as powerful new weapons are flowing to both the Syrian government and opposition fighters”.[4]  The news agency takes the long view that could lead one to consider that the whole Arab Awakening has also been long in the making. I pointed out last year that the Egyptian revolution appeared to have been planned in 2008, that the U.S. State Department was scheming to shake up the Middle East in order to replace no longer useful regimes with new and more amenable systems.[5]  The failure of the recent nuclear negotiations in Moscow seems to indicate that Iran could still be still a viable target . . .

An anonymous Arab intelligence official who appears to be in the know said that “C.I.A. officers are there and they are trying to make new sources and recruit people”.[6]  It seems that the Obama administration is taking no chances when it comes to Syria . . . perhaps that lessons were learned in Libya after all. Schmitt does make it clear that “[s]pokesmen for the White House, State Department and C.I.A. would not comment on any intelligence operations supporting the Syrian rebels”.[7]

Prior to the full-scale invasion of Afghanistan, a C.I.A. team in the Hindu Kushprepared the ground as well, making contacts, establishing alliances and recruiting fighters. Last week, the Wall Street Journal’s Jay Solomon and Nour Malas already reported that “U.S. intelligence operatives and diplomats have stepped up their contacts with Syrian rebels in part to help organize their burgeoning military operations against President Bashar al-Assad’s forces, according to senior U.S. officials. As part of the efforts, the Central Intelligence Agency and State Department—working with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and other allies—are helping the opposition Free Syrian Army develop logistical routes for moving supplies into Syria and providing communications training”.[viii]  It seems that President Obama’s best-laid plan for dealing with Syria and possibly Iran too is slowly falling into place . . .  As explained by , the Wall Street Journal’s Jay Solomon and Nour Malas the “U.S. in many ways is acting in Syria through proxies, primarily Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, say U.S. and Arab officials. Saudi Arabia is particularly fixated on overthrowing Mr. Assad, said Arab officials, viewing it as a way to settle scores with an arch foe and weaken its chief regional rival Iran. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are providing the funds for arms, Arab officials and Syrian opposition leaders say. The Obama administration hasn’t agreed to arm the FSA [the so-called Free Syrian Army], the U.S. officials stressed. Mrs. Clinton on Wednesday [, 13 June] denied charges by Syria and others that the U.S. has armed the rebels. The U.S.’s stepped-up links with the FSA are also part of an effort to gain a better understanding of the rebels’ capabilities and of the identities and allegiances of fighters spread in disparate groups across the country, the U.S. officials said. The U.S. officials remain wary of some rebels’ suspected ties to hard-line Islamists, including elements of al Qaeda. They acknowledged the FSA doesn’t represent all parts of the insurgency against the Assad regime”.[9]

The armed conflict in Syria is very much a proxy-war, pitting the U.S. and NATO against Russia, China, and their junior partner Iran. In this context, Russia’s naval base in Tartus recently gave President Putin the pretext to dispatch some armed comrades into the Mediterraneanand back again. Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov has now said that “The ship was carrying air defense systems, which can only be used to repel foreign aggression, and not against peaceful demonstrators, and yes — it was carrying three refurbished helicopters”.[10]  On the one hand, the Obama administration strategically leaked its not-so covert support for the Syrian opposition, and on the other, the Russians freely admitted their unwavering backing for Bashar al-Assad. Syria is the first battle-ground in the as-yet undeclared New Cold War.[11]


[2] Eric Schmitt, “C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition” The New York Times (21 June 2012). http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/21/world/middleeast/cia-said-to-aid-in-steering-arms-to-syrian-rebels.html?pagewanted=all.

[3] Eric Schmitt, “C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition”.

[4] “CIA joins allies helping Syrian opposition”.

[5] C. Erimtan, “Behind the scenes of Egypt’s revolution” Hürriyet Daily News (27 February 2011). http://tiny.cc/fz7tf.

[6] Eric Schmitt, “C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition”.

[7] Eric Schmitt, “C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition”.

[8] Jay Solomon and Nour Malas, “U.S. Bolsters Ties to Fighters in Syria” The Wall Street Journal (13 June 2012). http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303410404577464763551149048.html?mod=googlenews_wsj.

[9] Jay Solomon and Nour Malas, “U.S. Bolsters Ties to Fighters inSyria”.

[10] Kirit Radia, “Russia Admits Attack Choppers Aboard Syria-Bound Ship” ABC News (21 June 2012). http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/russia-admits-attack-choppers-aboard-syria-bound-ship/story?id=16620312.

[11] C. Erimtan, “The Arab Awakening and the never-ending Cold War” Hürriyet Daily News (22 June 2011). http://tiny.cc/p7q3b.

Updating the Syrian Narrative: The Qubair Massacre

While the United Nations and the U.S. seem to be getting ready to bring in the big guns, the Assad regime reveals its own big guns, as reported by Iran’s Press TV on Thursday, 7 June: ‘Syria has reportedly given anti-government militants 24 hours to turn in their weapons, warning of a military offensive against the foreign-backed armed gangs after the deadline expires, Press TV reports. An informed source, speaking on condition of anonymity, noted on Thursday [, 7 June] that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has informed the UN-Arab League envoy, Kofi Annan, of the warning in a letter. Reports say about 280 UN observers are currently in Syria to monitor the implementation of cease-fire, which is part of a six-point peace plan presented by Kofi Annan in March. The letter has made it clear that a military offensive against militants will follow the 24-hour deadline. The UN has given no response to the letter yet. Violence is still raging in Syria, where many people, including large numbers of security forces, have been killed over the past year. The West and the Syrian opposition accuse the government of the killings. Damascus, however, blames ”outlaws, saboteurs and armed terrorist groups” for the unrest, stating that the violence is being orchestrated from abroad’.[1]

The BBC reports from Qubayr: ‘UN monitors have reached a village in Syria’s Hamaprovince where a massacre took place on Wednesday, says the BBC’s Paul Danahar who has been travelling with the team. The observers, who were fired at near Qubair village on Thursday, arrived in a convoy from Damascus. Paul Danahar says the team is now checking the safety situation before the rest of the observers enter the village. He described the scene as “an idyllic spot, if it wasn’t for the misery that we are told awaits us at the bottom of the hill”’.[2]  It strikes me as weird indeed that the BBC has as yet not posted an update of this report, instead Danahar’s conjectures remain . . . “the misery that we are told awaits us at the bottom of the hill”. But so far, nobody seems to know for sure . . .

United Nations secretary general Ban Ki-moon has now issued a serious statement: “Syriacan quickly go from a tipping point to a breaking point. The danger of full-scale civil war is imminent and real, with catastrophic consequences for Syriaand the region”.[3]  And then there are Russia and China. The first has historical ties with Syria, stretching back to Soviet times, and the latter is happy client of Iran’s oil, while Iran appears to be Assad’s only ally in the region. The news agency Reuters’ Steve Gutterman reports that the “United States stepped up pressure on Russia to support a Syrian power transfer that would include President Bashar al-Assad’s exit after the second reported massacre in weeks deepened doubts Kofi Annan’s U.N.-backed peace plan can work. A senior U.S. State Department official, Fred Hof, held talks on Friday [. 8 June] with Russian Deputy Foreign Ministers Gennady Gatilov and Mikhail Bogdanov, the Foreign Ministry said. Hof made no comment to reporters outside the ministry building. U.S. officials have suggested Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sent Hof to Moscow as part of an effort secure a transition strategy that the United States says must include Assad’s full transfer of power”.[4]  Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov declared on Thursday, 7 June, that “We continue to speak out decisively in support of Syria’s sovereignty, and against foreign intervention in its affairs and attempts to force parameters of an internal Syrian solution upon it from outside”.[5]


[1] “Syria to militants: Lay down arms or face military offensive” Press TV (08 June 2012). http://www.presstv.ir/detail/245014.html..

[2] “BBC journalist reaches Qubair, Syria” BBC News (08 June 2012). http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18368081.

[3] “UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon Raises Pressure On Syria” The Huffington Post (08 June 2012). http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/06/08/syria-un-secretary-general-warns-of-full-scale-civil-war_n_1579874.html?1339137591&ref=uk.

[4] Steve Gutterman, “U.S. official meets Russians on Syria” Reuters (08 June 2012). http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/08/us-syria-crisis-russia-idUSBRE8570L320120608.

[5] Steve Gutterman, “U.S. official meets Russians onSyria”.

EU/Russia Summit in St. Petersburg, June 3-4, 2012

 EU/Russia Summit to discuss Eurasian Economic Union, CIS modernization, bilateral ties, situation in Syria.

And here is Herman van Rompuy, the President of the European Council, having his opportunity to mince a few words.

Following this minor Euro-summit, Putin took not such a slow boat to China, where he met up with Mister Hu for a big get together  . . .

RETHINK Afghanistan: Pulling Out in Time

Brave New Foundation’s Political Director Derrick Crowe on Current TV’s The Bill Press Show, discusses President Obama’s latest speech on the Afghanistan pullout timeline (7 May 2012).

On the RETHINK Afghanistan website one can read that The Agonist declares that ‘[n]ew French President François Hollande is losing no time in keeping at least one of his campaign promises. He’ll announce France’s early exit from Afghanistan at the NATO summit in Chicago later this month. . . . Both NATO boss Anders Fogh Rasmussen and President Obama are expected to try to talk Hollande out of his earlier withdrawal, I suspect not because it would really hurt the mission there but because the optics look bad for the stick-the-coursers’.[1]


[1] “Hollande To Carry Through On Afghanistan Exit Promise” The Agonist (08 May 2012). http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/.

The New Cold War: The Philippines between the U.S. and China

The United States and Philippines are conducting military drills in the South China Sea. TheUS claims these drills are strictly and exercise, but China sees this as yet another attempt by America to slowly fortify the area. All this is taking place in the Palawan Province where China and thePhilippines are fighting over the rights to water where there is believed to be $50 billion worth of oil. Paul Craig Roberts, former Reagan administration official and columnist, joins us to give us insight on what’s going on between theUS and China in the Pacific (26 April 2012).

Counting the Cost: China’s Economic Transformation

As China’s economic boom is built on exports, where will the country turn when that starts to falter? Plus, Jeffrey Sachs speaks about the World Bank leadership, US economic recovery and China’s global role (10 March 2012).

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 79 other followers