A Married Jesus and the Meaning of Christian Life: Coptic Claims

In the esteemed Harvard Gazette B. D. Colen writes: “Four words on a previously unknown papyrus fragment provide the first evidence that some early Christians believed Jesus had been married, Harvard Professor Karen King told the 10th International Congress of Coptic Studies” on Tuesday, 18 September 2012.[1] Colen elaborates that Karen “King, the Hollis Professor of Divinity at Harvard Divinity School, announced the existence of the ancient text at the congress’ meeting, held every four years and hosted this year by the Vatican’s Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum in Rome. The four words that appear on the fragment translate to “Jesus said to them, my wife.” The words, written in Coptic, a language of Egyptian Christians, are on a papyrus fragment of about one and a half inches by three inches”.[2]
Professor King elucidates that “Christian tradition has long held that Jesus was not married, even though no reliable historical evidence exists to support that claim. This new gospel doesn’t prove that Jesus was married, but it tells us that the whole question only came up as part of vociferous debates about sexuality and marriage. From the very beginning, Christians disagreed about whether it was better not to marry, but it was over a century after Jesus’ death before they began appealing to Jesus’ marital status to support their positions”.[3] Christianity, as the conceptual edifice built by the overtly misogynistic Saint Paul, has always had ambivalent feelings about issues relating to love and marriage, celibacy, the role of women and the meaning of life. Does man live solely to enter the next life in the heavenly kingdom or should he consider his sojourn on this mortal coil as equally valid and meaningful??? Celibacy, as a life style, clearly favours the former view. And there have been examples of excesses in early Christian history. The case of Origen of Alexandria springs to mind. It seems that the saintly figure had been inspired by Matthew 19:12 to castrate himself: “For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother’s womb: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven’s sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it”.[4] The King James translation seems to make it quite plain that celibacy could be considered a safe way to enter the heavenly kingdom. In the end, however, the pragmatic view that life on this mortal coil also deserves human sacrifice and hardship, as possibly symbolised in the institution of marriage necessarily leading to human reproduction, prevailed. As a result, the continuation of the human race was guaranteed and the figure of God in heaven remained unassailable. This then left Jesus as the ultimate example to be followed by those Christians deemed extremely pious and other-worldly, such as monks and nuns.

Now the whole debate in connection with the meaning of Christian life, as condensed in the issue of marriage or celibacy, has been reduced to squibbles about Jesus’ marital status . . . In conclusion, Professor King states that the “discovery of this new gospel offers an occasion to rethink what we thought we knew by asking what role claims about Jesus’ marital status played historically in early Christian controversies over marriage, celibacy, and family. Christian tradition preserved only those voices that claimed Jesus never married. The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife now shows that some Christians thought otherwise”.[5]

[1] B. D. Colen, “Suggestion of a married Jesus” Harvard Gazette (18 September 2012). http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/09/suggestion-of-a-married-jesus/.
[2] B. D. Colen, “Suggestion of a married Jesus”.
[3] B. D. Colen, “Suggestion of a married Jesus”.
[4] “Matthew 19:12” Biblos. http://bible.cc/matthew/19-12.htm.
[5] B. D. Colen, “Suggestion of a married Jesus”.












147 Corporations Run the World
Thom Hartmann: Clusters can be deadly in nature – but what about in an economy? I’ll break down a *new* scientific study which proves our global economy has clustered – and is now truly under the control of a few “bankster” puppeteers!
The article in the New Scientist that Hartmann was alluding to states that an “analysis of the relationships between 43,000 transnational corporations has identified a relatively small group of companies, mainly banks, with disproportionate power over the global economy”.[1]
In the periodical ScienceNews, Rachel Ehrenberg succinctly summarises the argument developed by the researchers in their paper “The Network of Global Corporate Control”,[2] as follows: “Conventional wisdom says a few sticky, fat fingers control a disproportionate slice of the world economy’s pie. A new analysis suggests that the conventional wisdom is right on the money. Diagramming the relationships between more than 43,000 corporations reveals a tightly connected core of top economic actors. In 2007, a mere 147 companies controlled nearly 40 percent of the monetary value of all transnational corporations, researchers report in a paper published online July 28 at arXiv.org”.[3]
And to illustrate the issue at hand, here is SERCO, the largest company you’ve never heard of or a network or cluster that combines an incredible numbers of services and industries on a truly global scale: ‘As well as thanking God for his success, Serco CEO Chris Hyman is a Pentecostal Christian who has released a gospel album in America and fasts every Tuesday. Coincidentally he was in the World Trade Centre on 9/11 on the 47th floor addressing shareholders. Serco runs navy patrol boats for the ADF, as well as search and salvage operations through their partnership with P&O which form Maritime Defence Services. Serco runs two Australian Jails already, Acacia in WA and Borallon in Queensland. They are one of the biggest companies in the UK for running electronic tagging of offenders under house arrest or parole. Serco are in one of the two favoured bid consortiums for the new Sydney metro rail line’.
On its website, the company presents itself as follows: ‘Serco improves the quality and efficiency of essential services that matter to millions of people around the world. The work we do for national and local governments involves us in the most important areas of public service, including health, education, transport, science and defence. Our private sector customers are industry-leading organisations in a wide variety of markets. We have nearly 50 years’ experience of helping our customers achieve their goals. Many want us to improve their productivity and service quality. Others need us to support their rapid growth. Government customers face crucial issues such as economic development, congestion, security and climate change. They value the innovation and passion we bring to these challenges, and the collaborative, flexible and imaginative way we work. Serco is a values-led company with a culture and ethos that is at the heart of everything we do. We give our people real responsibility, allowing them to put their ideas into practice and to truly make a difference for our customers and the public. Our approach has made us one of the world’s leading service companies and our vision is to be the world’s greatest. Our service ethos means that our customers come back to us again and again. These long-term relationships help us to meet their changing needs and to do what we do best . . . bringing service to life’.[4] The Guardian’s Jane Martinson describes Serco’s CEO as an “Indian Pentecostal Christian from South Africa, Hyman is an unusual chief executive in many ways, not least his enthusiasm for what he calls the values of doing business. He gave a speech on the subject at the Business in the Community conference [in 2005] which made seasoned executives sit up and take notice, such was his enthusiasm for putting people first so that the rest – profits, investors, power – would follow”.[5]
[1] Andy Coghlan and Debora MacKenzie, “Revealed – the capitalist network that runs the world” New Scientist (24 October
2011). http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354.500-revealed–the-capitalist-network-that-runs-the-world.html.
[2] Stefania Vitali, James B. Glattefelder, and Stefano Battiston, “The Network of Global Corporate Control” PLOS ONE (2011). http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1107/1107.5728v2.pdf.
[3] Rachel Ehrenberg, “Financial world dominated by a few deep pockets” ScienceNews (24 September 2011). http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/333389/title/Financial_world_dominated_by_a_few_deep_pockets.
[4] “About Us” Serco. http://www.serco.com/about/index.asp.
[5] Jane Martinson, “Happy, touchy-feely and driven by God” The Guardian (24 February 2006). http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2006/feb/24/columnists.guardiancolumnists.
Category:
Americana, Capitalism, Christianity, Current Affairs, Current History, Democracy, Europe, Financial Crisis, Interwebz, Labour Relations, Military-Industrial Complex, Millenarianism, Oil and Gas, Political Commentary, Propaganda, Religion, Uncategorized