— The Erimtan Angle —

 

‘The Turkish education system is “still inadequately equipped to ensure respect for parents’ convictions” and violates the “right to education,” the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has concluded, in a case stemming from Alevi complaints about mandatory religious classes. In 2011, applicants Mansur Yalçın, Yüksel Polat and Hasan Kılıç, who are adherents of the Alevi faith and whose children were at secondary school at the relevant time, complained that the content of the compulsory classes in religion and ethics in schools was based exclusively on the Sunni understanding of Islam, claiming that Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights Protocol No. 1 (right to education) had been violated. In its ruling, the court observed in particular that in the field of religious instruction, Turkey’s education system was still inadequately equipped to ensure respect for parents’ convictions. “Turkey has to remedy the situation without delay, in particular by introducing a system whereby pupils could be exempted from religion and ethics classes without their parents having to disclose their own religious or philosophical convictions,” said the court. The ECHR examined the case in the light of the curriculum of the compulsory religion and ethics classes, as well as the changes including information about the various beliefs existing in Turkey, including the Alevi faith. It emphasized the state’s duty of neutrality and impartiality in regulating matters of religion. Bearing in mind the particular features of the Alevi faith compared to the Sunni understanding of Islam, the applicants could legitimately have considered that the approach adopted in the classes was likely to result in their children facing a conflict of allegiance between the school and their own values, the court also added. The fact that the Turkish system only offers Christian and Jewish pupils the possibility of being exempted from religion and ethics classes suggested that Alevis faced conflicts between the religious instruction given by the school and their parents’ religious or philosophical convictions, the ECHR ruling added. The court noted that almost all European Convention signatory states must offer at least one route by which pupils could opt out of religious education classes, by providing an exemption system or the option of studying an alternative subject, or by making attendance at religious studies classes entirely optional. On June 22, 2005, the applicants asked the Education Ministry to initiate a consultation process with leading members of the Alevi community with a view to overhauling the curriculum of the religion and ethics classes to include Alevi culture and philosophy. After being notified of the decision to reject their proposal in a letter from the Directorate of Religious Education attached to the Education Ministry, the applicants and 1,905 other people challenged that decision in an Ankara administrative court. An expert report by a professor of Islamic studies and lecturers in education and religious sociology on the textbooks used in religion and ethics classes was included in the case file, which stated that the curriculum did not give precedence to any particular faith and adopted a supra-denominational approach. However, the applicants filed additional observations challenging the report. They argued in particular that the textbooks treated the Alevi faith as a tradition or culture and not as a belief system in its own right. The Ankara administrative court again ruled against the applicants on Oct. 1, 2009, relying on the expert report. Their subsequent appeal on points of law was dismissed by the Supreme Administrative Court in a judgment on Aug. 2, 2010, which held that the judgment at first instance was in conformity with the relevant procedures and laws (16 September 2014)’. [1]

The ECHR held its first session on 23-28 February 1959 and furthermore, the “European Court of Human Rights is an international court set up in 1959. It rules on individual or State applications alleging violations of the civil and political rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights. Since 1998 it has sat as a full-time court and individuals can apply to it directly. In almost fifty years the Court has delivered more than 10,000 judgments. These are binding on the countries concerned and have led governments to alter their legislation and administrative practice in a wide range of areas. The Court’s case-law makes the Convention a powerful living instrument for meeting new challenges and consolidating the rule of law and democracy in Europe. The Court is based in Strasbourg, in the Human Rights Building designed by the British architect Lord Richard Rogers in 1994 – a building whose image is known worldwide. From here, the Court monitors respect for the human rights of 800 million Europeans in the 47 Council of Europe member States that have ratified the Convention”.[2] Whereas, the “European Convention on Human Rights is an international treaty under which the member States of the Council of Europe promise to secure fundamental civil and political rights, not only to their own citizens but also to everyone within their jurisdiction. The Convention, which was signed on 4 November 1950 in Rome, entered into force in 1953”.[3] Whereas, the “Council of Europe is the continent’s leading human rights organisation. It includes 47 member states, 28 of which are members of the European Union. All Council of Europe member states have signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, a treaty designed to protect human rights, democracy and the rule of law”.[4] And, “Turkey became member of the Council of Europe on 9 August 1949”.[5]

 

 

[1] ” (1 of 1) AFFAIRE MANSUR YALÇIN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE” ECHR (16 September 2014). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx#{“languageisocode”:[“FRA”],”documentcollectionid2″:[“JUDGMENTS”],”itemid”:[“001-146381”]}

[2] The Court in Brief. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Court_in_brief_ENG.pdf/

[3] The Court in Brief.

[4] “The Council of Europe in brief. Presentation”. Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/en/web/about-us/who-we-are.

[5] “Turkey” Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/turkey.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: