Whither Libya??? The Execution of Gadhafi, the NTC, and a New Prime Minister
The future of Libya still seems uncertain following the brutal execution of Colonel Gadhafi, killed by Libyan thugs and instigated by NATO bombs and a lone U.S. drone. According to the ever-contrary broadcaster RT, a “hellfire missile fired by a US drone hovering some five miles above in the skies of Libya made the kill – now, that’s how it’s done in the 21st century – clinically precise and from far away”.[1] The military intervention did apparently not require foreign boots on the ground, but a UN-mandated resolution to protect civilians lives – “resolution 1973, authorizing its member states to implement a ‘no-fly zone . . . [and] to take all necessary measures to protect civilians under threat of attack in the country, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign
occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory’”.[2] On 19 March 2011, President Obama authorised the discharge of Operation Odyssey Dawn to implement this resolution, which gave the whole affair the gleam of a Just War, a concept that Barack Obama likes to bandy about a lot. After all, the NATO military intervention was aimed at preventing the wily colonel from killing his own people, but in the end, NATO bombers and U.S. drones turned out to have been deployed in an operation that was nothing but a veiled remote-controlled invasion to precipitate regime change. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s reaction to the news of Gadhafi’s death was most telling in this respect: “we came, we saw, he died!”.[3]
Does the war in Libya represent the future of warfare in this century, remote-controlled arms that kill and local proxies doing the dirty handy-work??? And, as it turns out, there were nevertheless some foreign boots on the ground but they were not American or European. Instead two unlikely players have contributed to the Libyan war effort: Sudan and Qatar – the BBC notes that ‘Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir says his country gave military support to the Libyan rebels who overthrew Col Muammar Gaddafi’,[4] and ‘Qatar has revealed for the first time that hundreds of its soldiers had joined Libyan rebel forces on the ground as they battled pro-Gaddafi troops’, as reported by the news agency AFP.[5] For one thing, it seems more that ironic President Bashir, who is wanted for crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Court in The Hague (ICC), in this instance assisted NATO and its Assisted Rebellion against Gadhafi and his troops. He explained that the Darfuri Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) succeeded in attacking the Sudanese capital three years ago as a result of Libyan aid and assistance, and that providence had now offered him the opportunity to reciprocate in kind. Addressing a crowd in the eastern Sudanese town of Kassala, Bashir stated: “Our God, high and exalted, from above the seven skies, gave us the opportunity to reciprocate the visit. The forces which entered Tripoli, part of their arms and capabilities, were 100% Sudanese”.[6] As for the Qatari involvement, from Tripoli the Guardian’s Ian Black reports that “Qatari special forces are reported to have provided infantry training to Libyan fighters in the western Nafusa mountains and in eastern Libya. Qatar’s military even brought Libyan rebels back to Doha for exercises. And in the final assault on Gaddafi’s Bab al-Aziziya compound in Tripoli in late August, Qatari special forces were seen on the frontline. Qatar also gave $400m to the rebels, helped them export oil from Benghazi and set up a TV station in Doha”.[7]
In the early years of the 20th century Italy invaded Libya, forcing the Ottoman authorities in Istanbul to direct their attention to that faraway Ottoman province in Africa. Subsequently, the outbreaks of the Balkan Wars (1912-13) and the Great War (1914-18) meant that the Ottomans were in no position to oppose Italian control of the oil-rich coastal land became Rome’s colony between 1911 and 1947. And now that Colonel Gadhafi has been eliminated, will the different tribal groups that make up Libya unite under NTC leadership and allow for a peaceful transition to representative democracy??? The NTC has already indicated that previously agreed oil deals would be honoured, so that turning Libya into a de facto colony seems quite unnecessary. On the other hand, if civil strife and tribal rivalry were to usher in an all-out civil war would the U.S. and its NATO allies leave well enough alone, or would they become part of the civil war, as has been the case in Afghanistan??? Britain’s new Defence Minister, Philip Hammond declared that “Libya is a relatively wealthy country with oil reserves, and I expect there will be opportunities for British and other companies to get involved in the reconstruction of Libya . . . I would expect British companies, even British sales directors, [to be] packing their suitcases and looking to get out to Libya and take part in the reconstruction of that country as soon as they can”. [8] And U.S. Ambassador, Gene Cretz turned out to be equally forthright, saying “We know that oil is the jewel in the crown of Libyan natural resources, but even in Qaddafi’s time they were starting from A to Z in terms of building infrastructure and other things. If we can get American companies here on a fairly big scale, which we will try to do everything we can to do that, then this will redound to improve the situation in the United States with respect to our own jobs”.[9]
Iran’s state-sponsored English-language broadcaster Press TV notes that ‘Gaddafi and his son Mo’tassim were buried in a secret location in the country’s Sahara desert [on Tuesday, 25 October 2011], Abdel Majid Mlegta, a senior National Transitional Council military official, said. Saif al-Islam is reportedly making his way towards Niger in an attempt to flee the country after the victory of the revolution. Former Tuareg leader Rissa ag Boula said on Tuesday that he is being ferried by Tuareg tribesmen’.[10] The report goes on to say that ‘South African mercenaries who allegedly participated in Muammar Gaddafi’s failed escape bid are now providing protection for his influential second son, Saif al-Islam. According to a report published by the Afrikaans-language Beeld newspaper on Thursday [, 27 October], the South Africans were hired by a company with close ties to the slain Libyan ruler, and were involved in training his presidential guard and handling some of his offshore financial dealings, AFP reported. They reportedly played a major role in helping Gaddafi’s wife Safia, his daughter Aisha, and sons Hannibal and Mohammed, flee Tripoli battle. Beeld said that the group of mercenaries was also was engaged in transporting Gaddafi’s gold, jewelry and foreign currency to the Western African country of Niger. The group is said to include former South African soldiers and policemen’.[11]
And finally, Al Jazeera reports that ‘Libya’s National Transitional Council has named Abdurrahim El-Keib as the country’s a new interim prime minister to replace Mahmoud Jibril. He won 26 out of 51 votes, and said that he expected to choose his cabinet ministers within two weeks. El-Keib is an award-winning electrical engineering professor who has taught at the University of Tripoli as well as numerous US universities. He most recently worked at the Petroleum Institute in the United Arab Emirates. Jalal el-Gallal, an NTC spokesman, said the council wanted to form a new interim government after the fall of Gaddafi because its initial members started out as an impromptu group. Hashem Ahelbarra reports from Tripoli’.
[1] “US drone kills Gaddafi” RT (21 October 2011). http://rt.com/usa/columns/namenotfound/us-drone-kills-gaddafi/.
[2] “Libya: Assisted Rebellion or a Just War?” A Pseudo-Ottoman Blog (31 March 2011). https://sitanbul.wordpress.com/2011/03/31/libya-assisted-rebellion-or-a-just-war/.
[3] Colby Hall, “‘We Came, We Saw, He Died’ Hillary Clinton Reacts To Confirmed News Of Gaddafi’s Death” Mediaite (21 October 2011). http://www.mediaite.com/tv/we-came-we-saw-he-died-hillary-clinton-reacts-to-confirmed-news-of-gaddafis-death/.
[4] James Copnall, “Sudan armed Libyan rebels, says President Bashir” BBC News (26 October 2011). http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-15471734.
[5] “Wed, 26 Oct 2011, 11:17 GMT+3 – Libya” AFP (26 October 2011). http://blogs.aljazeera.net/liveblog/libya-oct-26-2011-1117.
[6] James Copnall, “Sudan armed Libyan rebels, says President Bashir”.
[7] Ian Black, “Qatar admits sending hundreds of troops to support Libya rebels” The Guardian (26 October 2011). http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/26/qatar-troops-libya-rebels-support.
[8] Aijaz Ahmad, “Libya recolonised” Frontline, Volume 28 – Issue 23 ::(05-18 Nov. 2011). http://www.frontline.in/stories/20111118282300900.htm.
[9] Aijaz Ahmad, “Libya recolonised”.
[10] “’S. African mercenaries help Gaddafi son’” Press TV (27 October 2011). http://www.presstv.ir/detail/206929.html.
[11] “’S. African mercenaries help Gaddafi son’”.
Human Rights Watch: World Report 2012
World Report 2012: Strengthen Support for ‘Arab Spring’
Governments Should Support Rights, Not Abusive Allies
(Cairo, January 22, 2012) — Many democracies have allowed their ties with repressive allies to temper their support for human rights in the Arab Spring protests, Human Rights Watch said today in its World Report 2012. For reasons of principle and long-term interest, governments should stand firm with the people of the Middle East and North Africa when they demand their basic rights and work to ensure the transition to genuine democracies.
The 676-page report, Human Rights Watch’s annual review of human rights practices around the globe, summarizes major rights issues in more than 90 countries, reflecting the extensive investigative work carried out in 2011 by Human Rights Watch staff. On events in the Middle East and North Africa, Human Rights Watch said that firm and consistent international support for peaceful protesters and government critics is the best way to pressure the region’s autocrats to end abuses and enhance basic freedoms. A principled insistence on respect for rights is also the best way to help popular movements steer clear of the intolerance, lawlessness, and revenge that can threaten a revolution from within, Human Rights Watch said.
“The people driving the Arab Spring deserve strong international support to realize their rights and to build genuine democracies,” said Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch. “Loyalty to autocratic friends shouldn’t stand in the way of siding with democratic reformers. International influence is also needed to ensure that the new governments extend human rights and the rule of law to all, especially women and minorities.”
The World Report 2012 documents human rights abuses worldwide, including: violations of the laws of war in Libya and Afghanistan; the plight of political prisoners in Vietnam and Eritrea; the silencing of dissent in China and Cuba; internet crackdowns in Iran and Thailand; killings by security forces in India and Mexico; election-related problems in Russia and the Democratic Republic of Congo; mistreatment of migrants in Western Europe; neglectful maternal health policies in Haiti and South Africa; the suppression of religious freedom in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia; torture in Pakistan and Uzbekistan; discrimination against people with disabilities in Nepal and Peru; and detention without trial in Malaysia and by the United States.
Category:
Africa, Current Affairs, Current History, Democracy, Egypt, Indigenous Rights, Iran, Israel, Libya, Middle East, Pakistan, Political Commentary, Regime Change, Sudan, Syria, Turkey